Reading the results dashboard

After an audit completes, your project dashboard shows three layers of data:

1. The health score

A single number from 0–100 representing your overall technical SEO health. Use this as a trend line — the absolute number matters less than whether it's moving in the right direction week over week.

Score	Interpretation
90–100	Excellent — minor polish only
70–89	Good — a few issues to address
50–69	Fair — meaningful gaps present
Below 50	Needs attention — critical issues likely

2. The issue list

All issues are listed with:

Severity (critical / warning / info / pass)
Check category (e.g. Page SEO, Core Web Vitals)
Message — a plain-English description of the issue
Detail — extra context explaining why it matters and how to fix it
Affected pages — which URLs triggered this issue

3. Per-check breakdown

Click any check in the sidebar to see:

That check's individual score
Every issue it found, sorted by severity
The raw data it analysed (headers, meta tags, etc.)

Prioritising fixes

Not all issues are equal. Use this mental model:

Fix criticals first — they have the highest ranking impact and the most points available
Tackle Core Web Vitals early — Google uses these as direct ranking signals
Address schema issues — structured data significantly improves AI citability
Fix accessibility warnings — improves both UX and WCAG compliance
Review content issues — readability and word count affect both SEO and AI answers

Tracking improvement over time

Surfaceable stores a history of every audit. The History tab on your project shows a timeline of scores so you can see the impact of changes you make.

If a fix raised your score, great. If a deployment accidentally broke something, the score drop will surface immediately on the next audit.

Comparing audits

On paid plans you can compare two audits side-by-side. This shows:

Issues that were resolved since the last audit
New issues introduced since the last audit
Score delta per check